Saturday, 12 March 2016

            THE HACK THE PENTAGON CHALLENGE

The US government’s Department of Defence has announced that it’s inviting hackers to test the department’s cybersecurity as a part of a new pilot program. Hack the Pentagon is the first cyber security bug bounty program in the history of federal government.
As a part of this program, the government will allow qualified cyber security experts to conduct vulnerability analysis of the department’s websites. The government mentions that the program is modeled similarly to that of the nation’s biggest companies to enhance the level of network security.
During the first iteration, the government plans to subject only a selected set of public service to hacking attempts and avoid exposing more sensitive web pages like department’s critical, mission-facing systems.

Who will be allowed to participate in Hack the Pentagon?

Prior to the participation in the pilot program, the hackers need to register and submit to a background check. Once vetted, the hackers will be allowed to hack the specified services under a controlled and limited duration program. The announcement mentions that participants could be eligible for recognition and rewards.
“I am always challenging our people to think outside the five-sided box that is the Pentagon,” said Secretary of Defense Ash Carter.  “Inviting responsible hackers to test our cyber security certainly meets that test.  I am confident this innovative initiative will strengthen our digital defenses and ultimately enhance our national security.”
This program is an initiative of the US Department of Defense’s new division Defense Digital Service (DDS) that’s led by former Microsoft executive Chris Lynch. Mr. Lynch says that he’s using his industry contacts to invite security experts and coders to participate.
It should be noted that during the past years bug bounty programs have become a norm for the tech companies as it allows the tech companies to fix their security loopholes and services before hackers get a chance.
Hack the Pentagon pilot program will go live next month and we’ll be sharing the participation rules and requirement in the upcoming weeks.

     MICROSOFT NOW PUTS WINDOWS 10 UPDATES IN INTERNET EXPOLER
Microsoft is adding a new weapon to its aggressive Windows 10 push—or at least it appears that it is.
Earlier in the week, Microsoft added what sounds a lot like an advertisement for Windows 10 to its Patch Tuesday release for Internet Explorer, bundling it in with a critical security patch. The new update affects only Windows 7 and 8.1 PCs and brings an upgrade prompt to Internet Explorer 11.
In its description of update KB3146449, Microsoft says it “adds functionality to Internet Explorer 11 on some computers that lets users learn about Windows 10 or start an upgrade to Windows 10.” Or as we common folk call it, an ad.
As Woody Leonhard at InfoWorld first reported, this update will supposedly put a blue banner on the IE11 new tab page that says, “Microsoft recommends upgrading to Windows 10.” ExtremeTech points out this is not the same as the blue banner that pops up when you visit sites like MSN.com recommending an upgrade to Windows 10.
It also appears this ad can’t be stopped by rolling back the update, as it’s built right into KB3139929, a critical security update for IE11.
The impact on you at home: So far neither Leonhard nor ExtremeTech were able to get the supposed blue banners to show up in IE11 in testing. It may be that Microsoft hasn’t yet activated the banner ads, or that the company had second thoughts about the strategy. Either way, packaging Windows 10 upgrade prompts in a security update is a terrible idea and a breach of user trust.
The update went out to all PCs as part of the Patch Tuesday updates, but only non-domain joined PCs—such as home users and small businesses—will see the ads. PCs that are managed by an IT department will not see the new update prompts. At least not yet.

Monday, 7 March 2016

 FREE SERIALS FOR SOME IMPORTANT SOFTWARE TRY THEM UPDATES WILL BE     POSTED
                C CLEANER
3CLZ-WVNS-EN5P-XBGH-ULE2-9WF7
CONNECTIFY HOTSPOT
QQYA5V-FBXFHM-HDPU6C-LKW2XB-17M8A1-CCGDTB-KLXLDX-TDRE2Q-FR568K-NBFRY4-MRNKJS-F4JU3L-SXK2

QTT4QB-DELNBD-E4393F-9SPJ8Z-1QTC52-1CCGDT-BKLXLD-XTDRE2-QFR568-KNBFRY-4MRNKJ-SF4JU3-LSXK2
                          CYBER GHOST 2
Hurry to activate following codes !
PRSE5-CP23W-667TW-TJB4Q-UW2LF-SGU2E
PRSE5-KXUHR-SFHHT-SAC58-R65KB-SARMM
PRSE5-MMGHQ-G24Q4-WP8TJ-PGEHC-F6WF7
PRSE5-43HR2-SG7P7-7PYX8-CGQ65-ANPY7
       CyberGhost Premium 3 Months subscription codes !
TTL-Y8S5V-LCAJR-9RBEN-DF2Y8-7FPT9
TTL-BWA6W-HSDG9-WBT3K-BUH9V-7MUCM
TTL-9PHA7-G4JX6-G99B5-GRP2W-T7SAX
TTL-Q4P6Q-5L8L5-N4LA8-UNQAJ-X3SJR
TTL-54AV9-7V3RR-NAQTU-Y6XQ2-MA3KE
TTL-YNKXG-LLW5D-998TL-H3DDR-ET7NR
TTL-KY8XX-CL2TN-VT8XB-BH5KM-GHU4R
TTL-SUAP4-VVTGK-NQFYJ-LP5TW-WHRBK
TTL-5W876-NTSQC-755W6-VJY9N-Y3EYX
TTL-6VVY7-CSGST-9UCE2-HDREX-LJ5GH
              CYBER GHOST VPN
 PRMT-YKGDJ-2V87B-R4358-XNTNW-GMLVQ

    PRMT-6VJQF-G6SDB-AMG29-3M3N8-CKJAK

    PRMT-76NJU-8P6HF-UDP6V-DFEDR-3CM2P

    PRMT-GBATA-M2RYK-5EM5B-QY87W-YAY5M

    PRMT-JAQ3W-FPJDH-Y44J9-FVWFU-YFD9H

    PRMT-XCS83-A6M74-5RBFC-P53R7-L49TP

    PRMWD-7KH5B-M48X8-7Q977-QFUX6-R7LAR

Tuesday, 1 March 2016

        APPLE WINS THE COURT BATTLE AGAINST FBI
Apple has marked a remarkable victory against FBI in a Drug Dealer case. Well, this case might not be as higher-profile warrant case as San Bernardino, but still it is something which Apple can rejoice for. In a 50-page ruling, Magistrate Judge Orenstein at New york court found that the All Writs Act did not justify the government’s request, and denied the government’s request to legally compel Apple’s help to FBI.
This ruling might not help or put any effect on the San Bernardino case, but the verdict will surely work as a major confidence booster for Apple in the San Bernardino case which is being fought out in the California District Court.
Another advantage of winning the New York case for Apple would be that, even if Apple loses the California case, the verdict of New York case might help Apple in pushing another appeal for the San Bernardino case.
Nonetheless, the center question would still be same — Can the All Writs Act compel Apple’s help in breaking a locked phone?
While FBI is trying to seek the legal help against the inherent dangers in the San Bernardino case, Apple has replied with a brief detailing more than a dozen such cases, indicating the broad scope of the FBI’s efforts.
There might be a number of differences between the New York and California cases, although it’s unclear how legally significant they will be. The biggest difference is the central offense: The New York case is prosecuting a drug dealer while the California case focuses on a terrorism-linked office shooting in a health clinic.
What’s your take on this? Is Apple going to win the San Bernardino case?
your comments will be appreciated